Management Control System Fairness Reduce †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Management Control System Fairness Reduce. Answer: Introduction: In the report, a situation of an organization has been described. A conversation between the program director and project manager has been shown in the video. As per the CEOs order, the program director is compelled to launch the product early through the development process but the project manager does not acknowledge the suggestion of the e program director. The project manager tries to reason with the program director that launching the project early without proper security measures can have irreversible implications. Hackers could undermine the entire project by launching a full scale attack compromising customer personal information. But the project director persists that if the project is finished earlier, the project manager can enjoy more bonus for himself and for the team. Moreover, he says that the encryption procedure can be applied through an update three weeks after. The project manager refuses to give in to the offer and does not accept the offer. The project director t hen calls up the CEO to state that the project manager is refusing to cooperate with their offer. The CEO and the project director then comes to a joint decision that the project manager should be removed and a new one should be brought in who is more compliable and easy to manage. The final consequences of the entire scenario is that the project manager was changed by the CEO which delayed the project completion life cycle. Several ethical problems in the project development has been highlighted in the YouTube video. A project should be completed without intervention if an organization initiates a project. Proper time, procedure and quality should be maintained for the project. The organization must satisfy the client with the cost, implementation and estimated time for the project (Shah, Harrold Sinha, 2014). The security problems in the completion of the project must be explained by the project director to the client. The project manager should explain to the project director that the team will be unable to complete the project in the given time (Langevin Mendoza, 2013). As the CEO has promised the client that the project will be completed before a month, the ethical problem arises from this issue. The project team should have been conducted by the CEO if the project could have been completed earlier. The project director has to understand the current condition of the project. Due to the early launch of the product the ethical problem rises. The CEO must have thought that the early submission of the project would have been beneficial for the company as it would have generated more revenues. The project manager should have told the team to handle the project a little bit faster with overtime. To perform the project with reliable quality and perfect manner, the team members should have been provided ample time and ease of mind to complete the project. The only people who are responsible for the project dilemma is the program director and CEO. The CEO should have not accepted the clients proposal and should not have accepted any excuses from them. The client was permissible to say their ideas to the without perfecting the product properly. It is the duty of the organization to check whether the members are working ethically. In the given video, the entity which performed unethically was the organisation itself (MARRCH, August 2015). The organization should have known if they can handle delivering a perfect product early. The clients, team members of the project and the project manager are the all affected by the problems. Due to the pressure from the CEO and the program director, first, the project manager will be affected. As the project manager has to allocate each and every task to his team members and adjust their processes, he will have face the most difficulty in this particular situation. The team members will be the next entity to get affected by the situation as they have to design the project allocated the project manager. The employees health is a major concern due to overwork which is the duty of the organization to look after (Payne, Jones Harris, 2013). The client can also get affected as the project manager strictly said that he wont comply with the CEOs claims (Yeslam Al-Saggaf, October 2016). The best action of the YouTube video is that the project manager ignores the words of the director and continue his work on the project. As the CEO and the program director warns to change the project manager and assign a new one, the process will be time consuming as he had to learn the technicalities of the project from the start. The CEO should talk to the client and pursue them that the project cannot be delivered according to their schedule. This will be beneficial for the company as in case a cyber-attack occurs on the product, the name of the organization will suffer along with the client. The other action that can follow is the total resignation of the entire team so that the CEO gets his product delayed inevitably. The team can not comply with the unethical behaviour of the organization. A meeting can be done by the CEO with the team members to analyse the issue properly (Miao et al. 2013). The best action of the project must be taken by the CEO himself. Talking with the client in an understanding way and telling them about the possible risks associated can be done by only the CEO himself. As per the consequences shown in the video, the best option was to remove the project manager from the team and appoint a new one who will not have as much knowledge about the project as he has so the organization will suffer. The stakeholder affected in this situation is the project manager but the real stakeholder affected is the organization whose product delivery date will be delayed. The quality, time and cost of the project implicates the best option. Utilizing the best option will result in the project manager doing the project perfectly without hampering the project quality (Frederickson Ghere, 2013). If he delivers the project early, the quality of the project will not be as per the standards and can have serious implication due to lack of proper security measures. Due to less time, the project cost will rise (Jackson, Kumbhakern Leech, 2013). The project manager chose the best option as the estimated cost, time and quality will never vary. Conclusion To conclude the report, it can be stated that the organization should prevent these types of issues during the time of signing contract in the agreement paper with the client. During the initiation of the project, the client should state if they need the product early. The CEO as well as the program director should firmly comply with the deadline date of per the agreement. If the project is wanted earlier by the client, the quality of the project will suffer and not meet the required standards. References Frederickson, H. G., Ghere, R. K. (2013).Ethics in public management. ME Sharpe. Jackson, T. A., Kumbhakern, V., Leech, M. L. (2013).U.S. Patent Application No. 13/402,589. Langevin, P., Mendoza, C. (2013). How can management control system fairness reduce managers unethical behaviours?.European Management Journal,31(3), 209-222. MARRCH. (August 2015). ORGANIZATIONAL ETHICS AND PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY. https://www.marrch.org/?page=ethics_archive_0815 . Miao, Q., Newman, A., Yu, J., Xu, L. (2013). The relationship between ethical leadership and unethical pro-organizational behavior: Linear or curvilinear effects?.Journal of Business Ethics,116(3), 641-653. Payne, N., Jones, F., Harris, P. R. (2013). Employees perceptions of the impact of work on health behaviours.Journal of health psychology,18(7), 887-899. Shah, H., Harrold, M. J., Sinha, S. (2014). Global software testing under deadline pressure: Vendor-side experiences.Information and Software Technology,56(1), 6-19. Yeslam Al-Saggaf. (October 2016). Scenario 3: Early Launch. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v5M7ohdZ6qA .